Amazing peer-reviewed AI bots that predict premature births were too good to be true: Flawed testing bumped accuracy from 50% to 90%+

‘These models should not go into clinical practice at all,’ academic tells El Reg

A surprising number of peer-reviewed premature-birth-predicting machine-learning systems are nowhere near as accurate as first thought, according to a new study.…

Source link

Related posts

Automated Discovery of Data Transformations for Robotic Process Automation. (arXiv:2001.01007v1 [cs.AI])


Is this paragraph from Trump or an AI bot? You decide, plus buy your own AI for $399


Facebook’s chief AI scientist says that Silicon Valley needs to work more closely with academia to build the future of artificial intelligence


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy