Confirm or Refute?: A Comparative Study on Citation Sentiment Classification in Clinical Research Publications.

Icon for Elsevier Science Related Articles

Confirm or Refute?: A Comparative Study on Citation Sentiment Classification in Clinical Research Publications.

J Biomed Inform. 2019 Feb 09;:103123

Authors: Kilicoglu H, Peng Z, Tafreshi S, Tran T, Rosemblat G, Schneider J

Quantifying scientific impact of researchers and journals relies largely on citation counts, despite the acknowledged limitations of this approach. The need for more suitable alternatives has prompted research into developing advanced metrics, such as h-index and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), as well as better citation categorization schemes to capture the various functions that citations serve in a publication. One such scheme involves citation sentiment: whether a reference paper is cited positively (agreement with the findings of the reference paper), negatively (disagreement), or neutrally. The ability to classify citation function in this manner can be viewed as a first step toward a more fine-grained bibliometrics. In this study, we compared several approaches, varying in complexity, for classification of citation sentiment in clinical trial publications. Using a corpus of 285 discussion sections from as many publications (a total of 4,182 citations), we developed a rule-based method as well as supervised machine learning models based on support vector machines (SVM) and two variants of deep neural networks; namely, convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM). A CNN model augmented with hand-crafted features yielded the best performance (0.882 accuracy and 0.721 macro-F1 on held-out set). Our results show that baseline performances of traditional supervised learning algorithms and deep neural network architectures are similar and that hand-crafted features based on sentiment dictionaries and rhetorical structure allow neural network approaches to outperform traditional machine learning approaches for this task. We make the rule-based method and the best-performing neural network model publicly available at:

PMID: 30753947 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]

Source link

Related posts

Causality, Responsibility and Blame in Team Plans. (arXiv:2005.10297v1 [cs.AI])


Department of Energy and Cerebras Systems Partner to Accelerate Science with Supercompute Scale Artificial Intelligence


Executive Interview: Paul Bleicher, CEO, OptumLabs


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy