Biology

The fault in his seeds: Lost notes to the case of bias in Samuel George Morton’s cranial race science

by Paul Wolff Mitchell

The discovery of nearly 180-year-old cranial measurements in the archives of 19th century American physician and naturalist Samuel George Morton can address a lingering debate, begun in the late 20th century by paleontologist and historian of science Stephen Jay Gould, about the unconscious bias alleged in Morton’s comparative data of brain size in human racial groups. Analysis of Morton’s lost data and the records of his studies does not support Gould’s arguments about Morton’s biased data collection. However, historical contextualization of Morton with his scientific peers, especially German anatomist Friedrich Tiedemann, suggests that, while Morton’s data may have been unbiased, his cranial race science was not. Tiedemann and Morton independently produced similar data about human brain size in different racial groups but analyzed and interpreted their nearly equivalent results in dramatically different ways: Tiedemann using them to argue for equality and the abolition of slavery, and Morton using them to entrench racial divisions and hierarchy. These differences draw attention to the epistemic limitations of data and the pervasive role of bias within the broader historical, social, and cultural context of science.

Source link




Related posts

Ubiquitous Ubiquitin: The K63 Ubiquitinome

Newsemia

So this is a bit derivative, but I'm genuinely curious. 1. How do you get in contact to write pieces for big places like NatGeo or Newsweek? and 2. How do they compensate for just one article? Thanks!

Newsemia

Vici Health Sciences is announcing its successful completion of initial clinical studies for its 505(b)(2) product pipeline

Newsemia

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy